|
Column 1: |
Terms of increasing severity stages of caries for lay
persons |
|
Column 2: |
Terms for the visual apperance for increasing severity
stages of caries for professionals |
|
Column 3 |
Related scores to coulmn 2 |
|
Column 4: |
Activity assessment posibilities for the scores in column
3 and thus also columns 2 and 1 |
|
Column 5: |
Scores for radiographical classification of lesion
severity: |
| |
|
| |
0=no radiolucency |
| |
1= radiolucency in outer ½ of the enamel |
| |
2= radiolucency in inner ½ of the enamel±
EDJ
|
| |
3= radiolucency limited to the outer 1/3 of dentine |
| |
4= radiolucency reaching the middle 1/3 of dentine |
| |
5= radiolucency reaching the inner 1/3 of dentine,
clinically cavitated |
| |
6= radiolucency into the pulp, clinically cavitated |
| |
|
|
Column 6: |
Scores for Fibre-optic
translumination (FOTI); classification of
lesion severity: Proximal and occlusal
|
| |
0=
no shadow or stained area |
| |
1=
Lesion stays the same width when transilluminated/Thin grey shadow
into enamel when transilluminated |
| |
2=
Wide grey shadow into enamel when transilluminated
|
| |
3=
Wide grey shadow into enamel with no evidence of dentine shadow |
| |
4=
Orange/brown or bluish/black shadow < 2mm in width |
| |
5=
Shadow as described above and/or transillumination light is blocked >
2mm in width |
| |
6= Large area of frank cavitation with likely pulpal
involvement |
| |
|
|
Column
7: |
Risk assessment:h=high, m=medium, l=low |
|
Column
8: |
PTO =
Preventive treatment option; OTO = Operative treatment option |
|
Column
9: |
p =
progressing; a = arrested; r = regressing |
| |
|